The result? Far less noise, soft depth of field, and a surprisingly sharp image with superb highlight roll-off and color.
#Sigma 16mm 1.4 iso
By the time I reached the Sigma’s maximum aperture of f/1.4, ISO had dropped all the way down to 200 - far lower than what the Canon 11-22mm could ever dream of achieving. I set the Canon M50 to Auto ISO, then slowly opened-up the aperture.
I ran the Sigma 16mm and the Canon 11-22mm lens through a low-light test to see their relative ISO performance. But let’s take a closer look at the Sigma 16mm compared to the Canon 11-22mm to see how it performs. For Canon users looking for EF-M lens options, the Sigma lenses couldn’t come at a better time, because Canon-for whatever reason-has never expanded their EF-M lens lineup with anywhere near the breadth of their full-frame EF lens options.įor many, the Sigma 16mm should fill a huge need for filmmakers and photographers looking for a relatively affordable, high-quality, semi wide-angle prime lens for their Canon EF-M cameras. The Sigma 16mm f/1.4 lens is one of three new EF-M prime lenses now being offered by Sigma (including a 30mm lens I reviewed here). So when Sigma announced a new 16mm prime EF-M lens with a large f/1.4 aperture, I jumped at the chance to review it.
Not a problem when shooting video outdoors in plenty of light, but in low light, I’ve had to raise the M50’s ISO super high to compensate which causes footage to lose sharpness and display noise. As much as I like the 11-22mm, I’ve unfortunately been bitten more than once by its small f/4-5.6 aperture. For about a year now, I’ve been filming all my travel vlog content using a Canon M50 with a Canon 11-22mm EF-M variable zoom lens.
0 kommentar(er)
